![real analysis - Local maxima of the sum of Gaussian functions in *one dimension* are always strict local maxima - proof? - MathOverflow real analysis - Local maxima of the sum of Gaussian functions in *one dimension* are always strict local maxima - proof? - MathOverflow](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XyOBg.png)
real analysis - Local maxima of the sum of Gaussian functions in *one dimension* are always strict local maxima - proof? - MathOverflow
![I was running a software for generating molecules (Gaussian) and in the middle of the codes I found this quote. Can someone explain what it means? I don't understand what Kafka meant I was running a software for generating molecules (Gaussian) and in the middle of the codes I found this quote. Can someone explain what it means? I don't understand what Kafka meant](https://i.redd.it/aqy3nffu68471.jpg)
I was running a software for generating molecules (Gaussian) and in the middle of the codes I found this quote. Can someone explain what it means? I don't understand what Kafka meant
![For building or drawing "Methyl azide" in Gauss View, the number of charge should be zero or not? | ResearchGate For building or drawing "Methyl azide" in Gauss View, the number of charge should be zero or not? | ResearchGate](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Reza-Ashja/post/for_building_or_drawing_Methyl_azide_in_Gauss_View_the_number_of_charge_should_be_zero_or_not/attachment/5e38276d3843b06506d6e975/AS%3A854492991987712%401580738413334/download/Untitled.jpg)